| Categories | | • | Art, Architecture & Photography | | • | Audio CDs | | • | Audio Cassettes | | • | Biography | | • | Business, Finance & Law | | • | Calendars, Diaries, Annuals & More | | • | Childrens Books | | • | Comics & Graphic Novels | | • | Computers & Internet | | • | Crime, Thrillers & Mystery | | • | Fiction | | • | Food & Drink | | • | Health, Family & Lifestyle | | • | History | | • | Home & Garden | | • | Horror | | • | Humour | | • | Languages | | • | Mind, Body & Spirit | | • | Music, Stage & Screen | | • | Poetry, Drams & Criticism | | • | Reference | | • | Religion & Spirituality | | • | Romance | | • | Science & Nature | | • | Science Fiction & Fantasy | | • | Scientific, Technical & Mediacl | | • | Society, Politics & Philosophy | | • | Sports, Hobbies & Games | | • | Study Books | | • | Travel & Holiday | | • | Young Adult | | • | DVD |
|
|
|
|
1421: The Year China Discovered the World | 
enlarge | Author: Gavin Menzies Publisher: Bantam Books Ltd Category: Book
List Price: £9.99 Buy Used: £1.48 You Save: £8.51 (85%)
New (33) Used (36) from £1.48
Rating: 44 reviews Sales Rank: 5537
Media: Paperback Edition: New Ed Number Of Items: 1 Pages: 649 Shipping Weight (lbs): 1.3 Dimensions (in): 7.7 x 5.1 x 1.9
ISBN: 0553815229 EAN: 9780553815221 ASIN: 0553815229
Publication Date: March 1, 2004 Availability: Usually dispatched within 1-2 business days Shipping: International shipping available Condition: SUPER FAST SHIPPING, DISPATCHED SAME DAY FROM UK WAREHOUSE. NO NEED TO WAIT FOR BOOKS FROM USA. GREAT BOOK IN GOOD OR BETTER CONDITION. MORE GREAT BARGAINS IN OUR ZSHOP. amazon.co.uk/shops/awesome_books_001
| |
| Also Available In:
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Amazon.co.uk Review If you're going to make a stir, you might as well do it in style. And Gavin Menzies has caused one, big time. In 1421: The Year China Discovered the World, this retired Royal Navy submarine commander, who only visited China for the first time on his 25th wedding anniversary, claims that the Chinese navigator Zheng He discovered America some 71 years before Columbus. And not content with this, he goes on to suggest that Zheng He learnt how to calculate longitude several centuries before John Harrison supposedly nailed the problem. Unsurprisingly, this has not gone down too well in some areas and the book has been the target of some scepticism. Although Menzies has unearthed a few unknown primary sources, the bulk of his thesis depends on amalgamating several disparate areas of research into a grand unified theory. So he combines what we do know--principally that the Chinese built huge sailing ships with nine masts and that Asiatic chickens were discovered in South America--into what he considers compelling evidence. Menzies has also turned up some maps from the pre-Columbus era that appear to show the Americas, along with a few shipwrecks and Ming artefacts from along his supposed route. It all makes for a gripping read, even if the sum doesn't quite add up to the whole. For all the detail, Menzies is some way off providing proof. None of the supposed 28,000 colonists has left any documentary evidence because all records, boats and shipyards associated with his voyage were burnt by imperial order in 1433. This surely begs the question--if we know so much of Zheng He's voyages around the Indian Ocean, how come we know nothing of his trips further east? Nor, conveniently for Menzies, did any of the colonists return home in triumph. They either died en route or skulked home to obscurity after they were disowned by the emperor. So you either accept Menzies as an act of faith or brush him aside with scepticism. Either way, you'll have a lot of fun in the process as the book is never less than provocative. And even the sceptics will find themselves hoping Menzies has got it right, because there's something intrinsically uplifting about the notion of an amateur historian getting one over the professionals. --John Crace
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 39 more reviews...
Lovely PR hype - but sadly fairly rubbish history June 19, 2008 You'd hope for more from a former Royal Navy commander, but sadly while his publicity machine is first rate, his history is anything but.
It would be lovely to turn what we know about naval history on its head and say that the Chinese Admiral Zheng He conclusively 'discovered' America or Australia long before any European navigators/explorers.
Unfortunately, this book falls into the category of what publishers call "wa-wa" history. In other words, it ain't true - and the historical reseach is shoddy.
The publishers know it's rubbish. We the public know it's rubbish, but we buy it anyway. And so they publish, because they know we'll buy it and they'll make money. In other words we get the books we deserve. We should be reading decent, reseach-based histories - but we find them rather dull so we don't....
Despite the welter of 5 and 4 star reviews this book has garnered on Amazon, it is important - before you buy it - to note one important fact.
Not ONE single naval historian has given any credence to these claims. Not any European - nor any Chinese - historian. In fact, they all say that the evidence is not there.
While other readers seem to like this book, I have to say that having read other books on global trade and sea voyages in the pre-modern era, I found Menzies style very confusing and it was very difficult to follow his train of thought and how he was using evidence to support his conclusions
Astonishingly, Menzies seems to have ignored two key pieces of Chinese evidence for Zheng He's voyages which list the countries he visited - and don't mention anything that could be America.
In fact Menzies does not read Chinese and there are no direct quotes from any articles or studies written in Chinese. Which is pretty gob-smacking when you think the book is about a Chinese Admiral!
The book may be entertaining, and I am sure Gavin Menzies is a nice bloke etc etc. But that ain't enough. For me his book was full of circular reasoning, speculation, distorted sources and slapdash research.
Or as has already been said - this book may well prove to be the Piltdown Man of literature and should only be classified as fiction.
You may think this is a case of the little man, the amateur, beating the massed hords of the professionals. That is always a very beguiling image, but it's the wrong one to picture.
This book is a triumph for publishing hype and muddled thinking and writing. For that reason we should give it a wide berth. Unless of course you actually like your history as fiction. In which case, be my guest. However, you have been warned....
Mind boggling pseudo-history May 25, 2008 1 out of 1 found this review helpful
His far-fetched theories, while very interesting, have no scientific basis. Any curious fact stated in the book that was checked by a (reputable) scientists was found false. Read the well researched and scientifically sound "When China Ruled the Seas" by Louise Levathes, or check the Internet sites at & to understand the hoax...
Fiction not Fact February 20, 2008 3 out of 5 found this review helpful
Why do so many people believe this sort of rubbish when there are no facts to back any of it up?
Gavin Menzies - Chinese Cracker January 21, 2008 3 out of 4 found this review helpful
This book deserves comparison with tosh like the von Daniken books of the 70s - Chariots of the Gods etc - rather than any serious work of history. It is far fetched and does provide any convincing proof to back up the absurd claims that the Chinese traveled to and settled in parts of the US, Brazil, Africa, Australia etc. I live in Brazil so was interested in his comments on what happened here. This is what he says: "Just before the book went into print I was informed that a considerable amount of research had been carried out into the DNA of American Indian peoples of the Amazon and the Orinoco and the diseases that they had carried which were otherwise unique to China and South East Asia. Briefly, it concerns a skin disease of the Indians of the Mato Gross of Brazil; hookworm occurring in the Lengua Indians of Paraguay; roundworm in Peru and Mexuic; ancyclostoma duodenale in Mexico; and Chinese DNA in the Indian peoples of the Amazon, Brazil and Venezuela. It is conclusive proof of Chinese sea voyages to the Americas before Columbus." Could someone please explain how this confusing mish mash of statements is "conclusive proof" that the Chinese reached the Americas before Columbus? A sentence following this paragraph gives an example of his style throughout the book which is to use the subjunctive because practically everything he says is supposition. Note the number of times "would" appears. "After making landfall near the Orinoco, where they would have replenished their water and taken on fresh food, they would then have set sail once more for the south. The winds would have carried them past the Amazon delta down the east coast of Brazil to Cabo Blanco in southern Argentina". In conclusion I would like to say that I do not doubt that the Chinese carried out great sea voyages. This has been known for centuries so Menzies has discovered nothing new. You can be sure that if the Chinese had achieved all these feats then they would not have hesitated about boasting about them. However, Menzies produces no evidence under the convenient excuse that all the documents were destroyed when China decided to turn its back on the world. The style is as hard to stomach as Menzies' unconvincing claims. For example, the adjective "finest" is used on four occasions on one page. Not only do we have nearly 500 pages of turgid prose but a further 150 pages of appendices and indices. Be warned!
Infuriating December 19, 2007 6 out of 7 found this review helpful
As someone used to reading history and science books with the comforting plethora of footnotes, sources and references, this was a difficult book not to throw out the window, but I persevered in the hope that the bombshell would be dropped.
It never came.
The book is a compendium of idle speculation, and it is disappointing that someone can pass off a book of wishful thinking and opinion, make it as controversial and outlandish as possible, and make an absolute fortune while better books grow dusty because they actually reflect reality.
|
|
| | |
|